About CPs
Carnivorous Plant Digestion and Nutrient Assimilation

Once a carnivorous plant has procured an item for dinner, it has to have some way to turn it into fertilizer. What carnivorous plants do is very similar to what humans do with their dinner after they have eaten it. Most carnivorous plants have glands that secrete acids and enzymes to dissolve proteins and other compounds. The plants may also enlist other organisms to help with digestion. The plants then absorb the nutrients made available from the prey.

Digestion methods (with representative genera or species):

  1. Leaf surface
    • Leaf rolls and tentacles bend for increased prey contact (Drosera)
    • Leaf rolls or is rolled to contain digestion fluid (Pinguicula)
    • Leaf doesn't move (Drosophyllum, Triphyophyllum, Byblis, Roridula)
  2. Sealed trap (Dionaea, Aldrovanda, Utricularia)
  3. Pit or stomach (Sarracenia, Genlisea)
  4. Water pool (Nepenthes, Darlingtonia, Heliamphora, Cephalotus, Sarracenia purpurea and S. rosea)
  5. Commensal organisms (Roridula, Byblis, Darlingtonia)

Leaf surface and sealed trap digestion generally involve only digestive enzymes and other material supplied by the plant. The leaf surface carnivores release copious amounts of fluid to smother the prey, quickly digest it, and provide a vehicle for assimilation of the released nutrients. The leaves have special glands to make this possible and may also have special adaptations to make absorption of the nutrients more efficient than typical plants.

Drosera releases digestive juices through the glands at the tip of its tentacles and absorbs the nutrients through the tentacles, leaf surface, and sessile glands. In order to do this it bends its tentacles and rolls or bends the leaf to get as many tentacles as possible into contact with the prey for digestion and to make as much leaf surface available for absorption. Its relative Drosophyllum has differently structured, non moving tentacles and doesn't use them directly for digestion. Instead it has specialized glands on the surface of the leaf that release the digestive enzymes (see Carniv. Pl. Newslett. 11(3):66-73 ( ) for drawings and discussion).

The sealed trap of Dionaea does digestion in a way similar to the leaf surface digestion carnivores—upon capture of a prey, digestive enzymes in mucous are released. The advantage of the sealed trap of Dionaea is rain won't wash away the nutrients as digestion proceeds.

The sealed trap carnivores Aldrovanda and Utricularia already have water in their traps so they only need to release enzymes. Utricularia appears to release the enzymes continuously into its traps.

The other carnivorous plants use either a mixed mode of digestive enzymes and partner organisms (Genlisea, Sarracenia, most Nepenthes, Cephalotus, some Heliamphora, Roridula) or other organisms exclusively for digestion (most Heliamphora, some Nepenthes, Darlingtonia). Part of the reason for partnering with other organisms is that the plants actually have little choice in the matter. This could also be a factor for the leaf surface and sealed trap digesters as well. The prey will have gut flora that are quite capable of digesting their host when it dies. In addition, insect larvae, frog tadpoles, and predacious protozoans will or will attempt to take up residence in water-filled traps. The plant releasing digestive enzymes and acids into the traps will help tip the nutrition balance to themselves, but there are limits.

So how do we know which plants release digestive enzymes and when? The digestive glands are so small. Hartmeyer (1997) (Carniv. Pl. Newslett. 26(2):39-45) demonstrated a technique for using black and white photographic film to assay the presence of enzymes that dissolve protein. The plants use dissolved protein as a nitrogen source. The film contains silver salts in a gelatin matrix on a clear plastic backing. Proteases dissolve the gelatin protein leaving clear areas on a black background after the film is developed. The film can be laid on the leaves of carnivorous plants or drops of fluid from pitchers can be placed on the film. The tests can be done with or without stimulation by prey, salt, or yeast solutions. If you can still get real photographic film and developer, this test is easy to do.

The developed film test for protease is a quick and dirty test. Many carnivorous plants will test negative because the test is not sensitive enough, the enzymes they secrete do not dissolve gelatin or you cannot get the film to where the digestive glands are located.

Frazier (2000) (Carniv. Pl. Newslett. 29(2):56-61) discussed the history and status of the studies of the Nepenthes (and Drosera) protease nepenthesin. It is not easy to study nepenthesin because it is produced in small quantities, Nepenthes pitcher fluid my be contaminated with proteases from other organisms, and it may be bound to a carbohydrate. Nepenthesin works like the mammalian digestive protease pepsin but it is more stable and works best at higher acid levels (lower pH). It may also be unique in structure, even among plants.

In a more recent contribution Takahashi, et al. (2009) studied the acid proteases (= proteinases) found in Nepenthes, Cephalotus, Dionaea, and Drosera. The species they tested had at least two different proteases each and as expected Cephalotus was different from Nepenthes and Dionaea (not all the tests worked for Drosera). They determined optimal pH and temperature, protein cleavage sites, and stability. This study and others like it help us to understand what the carnivores are doing to make the amino acid components of a prey available to themselves.

Another element that plants need from their prey is phosphorus. Plachno, et al. (2006) used an interesting technique to visualize sites of acid phosphatase activity. A fluorescence labeled phosphatase substrate is used to make phosphatase glow under ultraviolet light. All cells contain phosphatases (all cells also contain proteases) but the substrate would not normally penetrate cell walls so we can see where phosphatases are found external to the cell or otherwise are being excreted. There is a special case where cells can be actively absorbing water or other substances. They can absorb the fluorescent substrate and light up on the inside.

Table from Plachno et al. (2006) Plant Biol. 8:813–820.

Phosphatase activities found in different types of glandular and epidermal cells. +++ means strong positive, ++ less, + only small reaction, – negative reaction.


Species Type of glands Reaction

Pinguicula

sessile glands
stalked glands
hydathodes

+++
+/++
++
Utricularia quadrafids
bifids
+++/++
+++/++
Genlisea arm hairs
neck hairs
bulb hairs
+++
+++
+++
Byblis liniflora sessile glands +++
Drosophyllum sessile glands
emergences
+++
+++
Drosera emergences +++
Aldrovanda glandular heads
quadrafids and bifids
external bifids
++
+++
++
Roridula gorgonias epidermis
emergences
+++
-
Cephalotus small glands
large glands
+++
+++/-
Nepenthes tobaica digestive glands +++
Brocchinia reducta glands (+)


Emergences are small structurally complicated leaf structures such as tentacles. Hairs are simple structures.

Plachno, et al., were able to visualized the locations where phosphatase was being excreted as well as where the substrate was being absorbed. The absorption of the substrate does confuse the issue a bit because it is hard to tell if a gland is multipurpose. It is very clear from the data that phosphatases are important to carnivores. Also there is more to understand about carnivory in Roridula and Byblis since they are clearly acting like full-on carnivores in this test.

Plachno, et al. (2009) did a study to determine how much nutrition carnivorous plants derive from their prey. They placed Drosophila flies on leaves of a number of plants for 10 to 15 days then analyzed the remains to see what remained. Presumably what remained of the fly after 10 to 15 days was what the plant did not absorb. An active carnivore should be able to remove a sizeable fraction of the nutrients from the fly. A non-carnivore would not.

Table modified from Plachno et al. (2009) Annals of Botany 104:649–654.

Comparison of % of nutrient uptake from Drosophila flies after exposure on plant leaves for 10–15 d.


Species N P K Mg

Roridula gorgonias 47% 75% 86% 39%
Drosophyllum lusitanicum n.s. 61% 44% 33%
Proboscidea parviflora n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s.
Ibicella lutea n.s. n.s. n.s. n.s.

All numerical results shown are significantly different from the control at P < 0.05. n.s. = not significantly different from control (i.e. 0%).

Their results show that Roridula gorgonias and Drosophyllum lusitanicum extract a significant amount of nutrients from the flies while Proboscidea parviflora and Ibicella lutea do not. The actual values shown in the paper for Proboscidea parviflora and Ibicella lutea are not even close to significant—in fact most show more nutrients in the corpse!—so it is not likely a more sensitive test of this type might exonerate those species.

-- John Brittnacher

D capensis
Drosera capensis consuming a large juicy food item (hydrated dried bloodworms, i.e. fish food).

Drosophyllum glands
Drosophyllum lusitanicum leaf close up. The red disks on the leaf surface are the sessile digestive glands. The stalked glands are only used for trapping prey. Photo by Thomas Cahill.

Sarracenia inside
Looking into a Sarracenia leucophylla pitcher full of corpses.

Sarracenia prey remains
Close up of the remains of prey in a Sarracenia pitcher. The plant does not digest the chitinous exoskeleton of the insects.

Aldrovanda trap
Scanning electron micrograph of the inside of an Aldrovanda trap. Note the X-shaped glands, trigger hairs, and circular, slightly stalked digestive glands. Image © Bartosz Jan Plachno, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland.

Aldrovanda glandScanning electron micrograph of an Aldrovanda digestive gland. Image © Bartosz Jan Plachno, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland.

Aldrovanda quadrifid gland
Scanning electron micrograph of an Aldrovanda quadrifid gland (black and white image) and quadrifid gland with fluorescence labeled phosphatase substrate under UV light (color inset). The quadrifid glands may release digestive enzymes but are probably primarily used for absorption. You would know this by watching the phosphatase substrate accumulate inside the cells. Image © Bartosz Jan Plachno, Jagiellonian University, Cracow, Poland.

Roridula dentata
Roridula dentata with captured flies.

For a more detailed discussion please see the following articles and articles they reference.

Chandler, Graeme (1978) The Uptake of Digestion Products by Drosera. Carniv. Pl. Newslett. 7(1):11-13 ( ) part 1

Chandler, Graeme (1978) The Uptake of Digestion Products by Drosera. Carniv. Pl. Newslett. 7(2):51-54 ( ) part 2

Frazier, Christopher K. (2000) The enduring controversies concerning the process of protein digestion in Nepenthes (Nepenthaceae). Carniv. Pl. Newslett. 29(2):56-61

Studnicka, Miloslav (2001) New Observations of leaf movements in Pinguicula (Lentibulariaceae). Carniv. Pl. Newslett. 30(2):51-54 ( )

Hartmeyer, Siegfried (1997) Carnivory of Byblis revisited - A simple method for enzyme testing on carnivorous plants. Carniv. Pl. Newslett. 26(2):39-45

Bringmann, Gerhard and Matthias Wenzel and, Henrick Philipp Bringmann and Jan Schlauer (2001) Uptake of the amino acid alaninie by digestive leaves: proof of carnivory in the tropical liana Triphyophyllum peltatum (Dioncophyllaceae). Carniv. Pl. Newslett. 30(1):15-21 ( )

Takahashi, Kenji and Masao Tanji and Chiaki Shibata (2007) Variations in the content and isozymic composition of nepenthesin in the pitcher fluids among Nepenthes species. Carniv. Pl. Newslett. 36(3):73-76 ( )

Takahashi, Kenji and Koji Matsumoto and Wataru Nishii and Miho Muramatsu and Keiko Kubota and Chiaki Shibata and Senareth B.P. Athauda (2009) Comparative studies on the acid proteinase activities in the digestive fluids of Nepenthes, Cephalotus, Dionaea, and Drosera. Carniv. Pl. Newslett. 38(3):75-82 ( )

Plachno, B. J., L. Adamec, I. K. Lichtscheidl, M. Peroutka, W. Adlassnig, and J. Vrba (2006) Fluorescence Labelling of Phosphatase Activity in Digestive Glands of Carnivorous Plants. Plant Biol. 8:813–820 (available here)

Adamec, L. (1997) Mineral nutrition of carnivorous plants: A review. Botanical Review 63:273-299.

Plachno, Bartosz Jan, Lubomir Adamec and Herve Huet (2009) Mineral nutrient uptake from prey and glandular phosphatase activity as a dual test of carnivory in semi-desert plants with glandular leaves suspected of carnivory. Annals of Botany 104:649–654.

Previous page: CP Trapping Mechanisms
Next page: Evolution of the Caryophyllales Carnivores



©International Carnivorous Plant Society      
www.carnivorousplants.org

Google Custom Search

This page is maintained by John Brittnacher,